I decided to write this as I'm watching, so it's a live blog if you will, that will poster after, so it's like a game show where it's "recorded live" kind of a thing. So, here we are, one of the last State of the Union addresses that President Obama will deliver. It's also being delivered to a Republican controlled Congress which could end up being like the last two years of the Clinton administration, or on the other hand it could go the way it's been going and we end up getting even less done than we did during the last Congress. So, it will be interesting to see what the president has to say tonight given the climate of what's going on. My hope is to see the campaign Obama who can help inspire as we are starting to see the economy turn around.
The first portion thus far has been kind of setting the stage of how the economy is improving, that jobs are being create, gas prices are lower, fuel standards are higher, and things are looking up. He has set a good basis for things are doing better than they were, that things are stronger than they were and that things are starting to look up. Basically he's doing the "Democratic Greatest Hits" of the last six years or so since Obama became president. For the most part it's a defense of Democratic principles and how because of these actions things are doing better. Also calling out the Republicans for constantly fighting over repealing Obamacare, shutting down the government, and pulled out the threat of a Veto for things that would go against these things.
I'm glad that he threw out the Veto threat because I feel like it shows that he's not playing games and winning political points aren't what needs to be done. It's also a waste of time to go after these things that don't matter and that are just symbolic (for example voting like 50 times to repeal the Affordable Care Act).
So, he's talking about child care, which is going to be important soon because it's crazy how expensive it is for that shit. There's a daycare up near my office that caters to UM people, and it's like $1600 a month for someone Sal's age. That's nearly my entire monthly paycheck. At that rate why would I even bother working? I could work a part time evening job in the evenings and come up with the rest of what I would have left over after paying $1600 a month for child care. I also totally support the idea of sick leave and parent leave that he's talking about. I was lucky enough to have a few weeks of vacation time that I could use but really getting balanced to a new life needs more time.
Now, I can't support the idea of free community college for two years any more! It is a wonderful idea and it will help those that need it the most. Many people who go to a community college do so because it's all they can afford to start off with, or they do it as a stepping stone to a larger university. This is an opportunity that makes a lot of sense. We are not an economy that people can just graduate high school and find a job. Manufacturing isn't like it used to be where my parents or grandparents could just graduate then find a job down at the Ford plant for the rest of their lives making good money and receiving good benefits. Also, the low end jobs are going to disappear and become automated just like Manufacturing was. Why do we need three cashiers at McDonalds when they can just set up screens where you can order and pay yourself? Look at Chili's where you now can pay and order drink refills or appetizers or desserts already. Soon waiters and waitresses will just be servers who deliver the food and nothing more. Education is going to become more and more important and we need to invest in that now and be preemptive rather than react once thing go south.
YES! Talking about Orion! The president of the United States just said that he wants us to go out to space not to visit but to stay. That's colonization right? We're talking about going to Mars and staying there, right?! Perhaps the way to do that is to fund NASA more. It's R&D and the returns on what we've done so far has been very good.
Well we're on to taxes and according to the NBC side bar what the president is talking about is closing loop holes and raising capital gains taxes to 28%, which to me doesn't sound like that bad of a thing because that's where the rich make their money. Who cares about the income tax, they don't make income at the same scale as they do from investments, which is where capital gains comes in. Seems like a logical plan given the income gap between the upper classes and the lower.
On to ISIS, and the request for the use of force against ISIS. I'm kind of surprised that this hasn't happened yet. I mean we're already bombing them, so what more are they looking for? Also some tough talk about Russia. Also a lot of support for Cuba, though they did a nice shot of Marco Rubio sitting silently. I think the general public supports the idea of ending the embargo, it's been 50 years and it's really getting king of silly at this point. It's more like when you say you're going to do something but you don't mean it but then you're stuck and have to keep doing it because you've been doing it for so long. Finally a discussion on talking about Iran and how the strategy there has been going better there than they had been, and some talk about North Korea and hacking and how that was addressed. Basically it seems like what Obama is trying to do argue agains the idea that some are trying to paint saying he's been terrible on foreign policy.
So far we're a good way into the speech but it doesn't feel like he's asking for a lot of things, more he's just talking about what they've been doing and how it's been working. I'm not saying that's good or bad, it just feels a bit different. I know there have been some specific things such as the college plan, the tax plan, and the authorization for the use of force agains ISIS, but other than he's not really asking for anything specific. Perhaps that's just a misconception by me as I'm trying to blog and watch.
Now we're off to Climate Change. I love how he just used the "I'm not a scientist" nonsense that politicians use and followed it up by saying "I know a lot of scientists and this is what they are saying!" I like that he said scientist say it's a problem, and the Pentagon says it's a national security issue. Really the other side of this doesn't have a legitimate leg to stand on for this issue. The science is there, the military is behind it, people who know what they are talking about are behind it, so there's no reason we're still fucking around on this. It was also a nice reminder that the US and China did come to an agreement on climate which I had forgotten about.
I'm not an overly critical person, but I'm not so sure I'm feeling confident when the President talks about how we don't torture and that we will use drones responsibly. I'm still very annoyed about the torture report that came out and even more annoyed that it was just dropped as if it wasn't a big deal. It's a huge deal and it's just swept under the rug. We can't stand on our values and our principles when we're doing that sort of shit. And I can't really trust that we're doing right given that we weren't and that we hid it. The idea of terrorism was used to scare us into doing despicable things that go against what we are about, but when you star tot do those things and start to defend it then perhaps we aren't what we're about and maybe we're the bad guys.
Here we come to the climate of Washington right now. Imagine if we did something different, which given Boehner's uninterested face I'm sure he's not even listening. He's sort of staring blankly into the crowd and then doing his best noncommittal clap when everyone else starts clapping. This is clearly falling on deaf ears. You can't have people "Join the great mission of building America" when the other side doesn't feel like you should be building anything. The Republicans feel like it's not the government's job, which is why that kind of thought won't come to anything. They are on the "limit government" train, so you can't expect that they'll get onboard with much of anything except dismantling what has been done in the past.
Really I think that is what sums up this speech. The entire time you've got Boehner kid of looking out and not paying attention and the President talking about what he wants and how he sees us. He's totally disengaged which is exactly what the Republicans have been for years now. They have the policy of doing nothing, and they plan to keep that up. I don't feel at all optimistic about how things will go forward from here. It was a decent speech and I agree with what he had to say but I feel like it's falling on deaf ears of those who think that they are somehow the only ones who get to do anything. They expect that they can do nothing unless it's 100% what they want and compromise on nothing. Perhaps time will show differently, but I doubt it. Here's to hoping that the next two years show something getting done and that things can swing back the other way at the next election.
It seemed like a shorter speech and the mood was different than it used to be. I don't feel like the crowd is as respectful as it used to be. There were kind of heckles that remind me of the "you lie" comment a few years back. That sort of things never would have happened to Bush, so why is it happening now? Anyhow, another State of the Union is down, he's got one left, but this was really the big one since next time surely we'll be into election mode and the lame duck will fully set in.
Picture(s) of the Day:
Picture 20

A view of my set up as I watched the speech. As a kind of follow up I thought the Republican rebuttal was absurd. Again they were all about Keystone XL, and repealing the Affordable Care Act. Also, I felt like I was watching some movie where they had the leader of some evil government talking like they are for you and good people. You know, like the Hunger Games, or V for Vendetta.